3.2. Domain Layer Implementation

Caution

This version is already obsolete. Please check the latest guideline.

3.2.1. Roles of domain layer

Domain layer implements business logicto be provided to the application layer.

Implementation of domain layer is classified into the following.

Sr. No.	Classification	Description
1.	Implementation of Entity	Creation of classes (Entity class) to hold business data.
2.	Implementation of Repository	Implementation of the methods to operate on business data. These methods are provided to Service classes. These are in particular the CRUD operations on Entity object.
3.	Implementation of Service	Implementation of the methods for executing business logic. These methods are provided to the application layer. Business data required by the business logic is fetched as the Entity object through the Repository.

This guideline recommends the structure of creating Entity classes and Repository for the following reasons.

1. By splitting the overall logic into business logic (Service) and the logic to access business data, the implementation scope of business logic gets limited to the implementation of business rules,
2. Access logic to business data is standardized by consolidating the operations of business data in the Repository.

Note

Though this guideline recommends a structure to create Entity classes and Repository, it is not mandatory to perform development in this structure.

Decide a structure by taking into account the characteristics of the application as well as the project (structure of development team and development methodology).

3.2.2. Flow of development of domain layer

Flow of development of domain layer and allocation of roles is explained here.

A case where application is created by multiple development teams is assumed; however, the flow itself remains same even if developed by a single team.

Sr. No.	Team in-charge	Description
(1)	Common development team	Common development team designs and creates Entity classes.
(2)	Common development team	Common development team works out access pattern for the Entity classes extracted in (1) and designs methods of Repository interface. Common development team should implement the methods to be shared by multiple development teams.
(3)	Common development team	Common development team provides Entity classes and Repository created in (1) and (2) to the business application development team. At this time, it requests each business application development team to implement the Repository interface.
(4)	Business application development team	Business application development team takes charge of the implementation of Repository interface.
(5)	Business application development team	Business application development team develops Service interface and Service class using the Entity class and Repository provided by the common development team and the Repository implementation class created by the team itself.

Warning

A system having a large development scope is often developed by assigning the application to multiple teams. In that case, it is strongly recommended to provide a common team to design Entity classes and Repository.

When there is no common team, O/R Mapper(MyBatis, etc.) should be called directly from Service and a method to access business data should be adopted without creating Entity classes and Repository .

3.2.3. Implementation of Entity

3.2.3.1. Policy of creating Entity class

Create an Entity using the following method.

Specific creation method is shown in Example of creating Entity class.

Sr. No.	Method	Supplementary
1.	Create Entity class for each table.	However, Entity class is not required for mapping tables which represent the relationship between the tables. Further, when the tables are not normalized, Entity class for each table rule may not be applicable. Refer to the Warning as well as Note outside this table for the approach related to not-normalized tables.
2.	When there is a FK (Foreign Key) in the table, the Entity class of FK destination table must be defined as one of the properties of this Entity.	When there is 1:N relationship with FK destination table, use either java.util.List<E> or java.util.Set<E>. The Entity corresponding to the FK destination table is called as the related Entity in this guideline.
3.	Treat the code related tables as java.lang.String rather than as an Entity.	Code related tables are to manage the pairs of code value and name. When there is a need to bifurcate the process as per code values, enum class corresponding to code value should be created and it must be defined as property.

Warning

When table is not normalized, check whether to use the method of creating the Entity classes and Repository by considering the following points. Since the unnormalized tables do not have good compatibility with JPA, it is better not to use JPA.

• Creating an appropriate Entity class may often not be possible because of increased difficulty in creating entities if the tables are not normalized.

  In addition, efforts to create an Entity classes also increases.

  Two viewpoints must be taken into consideration here. Firstly “Can we assign an engineer who can perform normalization properly?” and secondly “Is it worth taking efforts for creating normalized Entity classes?”.
• If the tables are not normalized, the logic to fill the gap of differences between the Entity class and structure of table is required in data access.

  Here the viewpoint to be considered is, “Is it worth taking efforts to fill the gap of differences between the Entity class and structure of table ?”.

The method of creating Entity classes and Repository is recommended; however, the characteristics of the application as well as the project (structure of development team and development methodology) must also be taken into account.

Note

If you want to operate business data as application, and as normalized Entity even if the tables are not normalized, it is recommended to use MyBatis as an implementation of RepositoryImpl of the infrastructure layer.

MyBatis is the O/R Mapper developed to map the SQL with object and not to map the database table record with object. Therefore, mapping to the object independent of table structure is possible depending on the implementation of SQL, .

3.2.3.2. Example of creating Entity class

The creation of Entity class is explained using specific examples.

Following is an example of creating the business data of Entity classes required for purchasing a product on some shopping site.

3.2.3.2.1. Table structure

The table structure is as given below:

Sr. No.	Classification	Table name	Description
(1)	Transaction related	t_order	Table to store orders. 1 record is stored for 1 order.
(2)		t_order_item	Table to store the products purchased in 1 order. Record of each product is stored when multiple products are purchased in 1 order.
(3)		t_order_coupon	Table to store the coupon used in a single order. Record of each coupon is stored when multiple coupons are used in 1 order. No record is stored when coupon is not used.
(4)	Master related	m_item	Master table to define products.
(5)		m_category	Master table to define product category.
(6)		m_item_category	Master table to define the category of the product. Mapping between product and category is maintained. Model where 1 product belongs to multiple categories.
(7)		m_coupon	Master table to define coupons.
(8)	Code related	c_order_status	Code table to define order status.

3.2.3.2.2. Entity structure

If Entity classes are created with the help of policy defined by the above table, it results into the following structure.

Sr. No.	Class name	Description
(1)	Order	Entity class indicating 1 record of t_order table. Multiple OrderItem and OrderCoupon are stored as the related Entity.
(2)	OrderItem	Entity class indicating 1 record of t_order_item table. Item is stored as the related Entity.
(3)	OrderCoupon	Entity class indicating 1 record of t_order_coupon table. Coupon is stored as the related Entity.
(4)	Item	Entity class indicating 1 record of m_item table. Multiple Category are stored as the related Entity. The association between Item and Category is done using m_item_category table.
(5)	Category	Entity class indicating 1 record of m_category table.
(6)	ItemCategory	Entity class is not created since m_item_category table is the mapping table to store the relationship between m_item table and m_category table.
(7)	Coupon	Entity class indicating 1 record of m_coupon table.
(8)	OrderStatus	Entity class is not created since c_order_status table is code table.

As it can be observed from the above entity diagram, it might first seem that Order class is the only main entity class in the shopping site application; however, there are other main entity class as well other than Order class.

Below is the classification of main Entity classes as well as Entity class which are not main.

The following 4 Entities are treated as the main Entity for creating shopping site application.

Sr. No.	Entity class	Reasons for treating as the main Entity.
(1)	Order class	It is one of the most important Entity class in the shopping site. Order class is the Entity indicating the order itself and a shopping site cannot be created without the Order class.
(2)	Item class	It is one of the most important Entity class in the shopping site. Item class is the Entity indicating the products handled in the shopping site and a shopping site cannot be created without Item class.
(3)	Category class	Product categories are displayed usually on the top page or as a common menu in shopping sites. In such shopping sites, Category becomes a main entity. Usually operations like ‘search category list’ can be expected.
(4)	Coupon class	Often discounts through coupons are offered in the shopping sites as a measure of promoting sales of the products. In such shopping sites, Coupon becomes a main entity. Usually operations like ‘search coupon list’ can be expected.

The following are not main Entities for creating shopping site application.

Sr. No.	Entity class	Reason of not treating Entity as main Entity
(5)	OrderItem class	This class indicates 1 product purchased in 1 order and exists only as the related Entity of Order class. So OrderItem class should not be considered as main Entity.
(6)	OrderCoupon	This class indicates 1 coupon used in 1 order and exists only as the related Entity of Order class. So, OrderCoupon class should not be considered as main Entity.

3.2.4. Implementation of Repository

3.2.4.1. Roles of Repository

Repository has following 2 roles.

1. To provide to Service, the operations necessary to control Entity lifecycle (Repository interface).

   The operations for controlling Entity lifecycle are CRUD operations.

2. To provide persistence logic for Entity (implementation class of Repository interface).

   Entity object should persist irrespective of the lifecycle (start and stop of server) of application.

   Mostly relational database is the permanent destination of Entity. However, NoSQL database, cache server, external system and file (shared disk) can also be the permanent destination.

   The actual persistence processing is done using O/R Mapper API.

   This role is implemented in the RepositoryImpl of the infrastructure layer. Refer to Implementation of Infrastructure Layer for details.

3.2.4.2. Structure of Repository

Repository consists of Repository interface and RepositoryImpl and performs the following roles.

Sr. No.	Class(Interface)	Role	Description
(1)	Repository interface	Defines methods to control Entity lifecycle required for implementing business logic (Service).	Defines methods for CRUD operations of the Entity and is not dependent on persistence layer. Repository interface belongs to the domain layer since it plays the roles of defining the operations on Entity required for implementing business logic (Service).
(2)	RepositoryImpl	Implements the methods defined in Repository interface.	Implements CRUD operations of the Entity and is dependent on persistence layer. Performs actual CRUD processes using API that performs persistence provided by Spring Framework, O/R Mapper and middleware. RepositoryImpl belongs to infrastructure layer since it plays the role of implementing the operations defined in Repository interface. Refer to Implementation of Infrastructure Layer for the implementation of RepositoryImpl.

In case of multiple destinations in persistence layer, the resulting configuration as follows.

due to this, the logic depending on persistence platform of Entity is hidden from business logic (Service).

Note

Is it possible to hide 100% of persistence platform dependent logic from the Service class ?

In some cases it cannot be hidden completely due to constraints of persistence platform and the libraries used to access the platform. As much as possible, platform dependent logic should be implemented in RepositoryImpl instead of Service class. When it is difficult to exclude the platform dependent logic and merits of doing so are less, persistence platform dependent logic can be implemented as a part of business logic (Service) process.

A specific example of this is given here. There are cases when unique constraints violation error is needed to be handled when save method of org.springframework.data.jpa.repository.JpaRepository interface provided by Spring Data JPA is called. In case of JPA, there is a mechanism of cache entity operations and SQL is executed when transactions are committed. Therefore, since SQL is not executed even if save method of JpaRepository is called, unique constraints violation error cannot be handled in logic. There is a method (flush method) to reflect cached operations as means to explicitly issue SQLs in JPA. saveAndFlush and flush methods are also provided in JpaRepository for the same purpose. Therefore, when unique constraints violation error needs to be handled using JpaRepository of Spring Data JPA, JPA dependent method (saveAndFlush or flush) must be called.

Warning

The most important purpose of creating Repository is not to exclude the persistence platform dependent logic from business logic. The most important purpose is to limit the implementation scope of business logic (Service) to the implementation of business rules. This is done by separating the operations to access business data in Repository. As an outcome of this, persistence platform dependent logic gets implemented in Repository instead of business logic (Service).

3.2.4.3. Creation of Repository

Repository must be created using the following policy only.

Sr. No.	Method	Supplementary
1.	Create Repository for the main Entity only.	This means separate Repository for operations of related Entity is not required. However, there are case when it is better to provide Repository for the related Entity in specific applications (for example, application having high performance requirements etc).
2.	Place Repository interface and RepositoryImpl in the same package of domain layer.	Repository interface belongs to domain layer and RepositoryImpl belongs to infrastructure layer. However, Java package of RepositoryImpl can be same as the Repository interface of domain layer.
3.	Place DTO used in Repository in the same package as Repository interface.	For example, DTO to store search criteria or summary DTO for that defines only a few items of Entity.

3.2.4.4. Example of creating Repository

An example of creating Repository is explained here.

An example of creating Repository of Entity class used in the explanation of Example of creating Entity class is as follows.

3.2.4.4.1. Structure of Repository

Entity class used in the explanation of Example of creating Entity class is used as an example, the resulting configuration is as follows:

Repository is created for the main Entity class.

Refer to Project structure for the recommended package structure.

3.2.4.5. Definition of Repository interface

3.2.4.5.1. Creation of Repository interface

An example of creating Repository interface is introduced below.

• SimpleCrudRepository.java

This interface provides only simple CRUD operations.

Method signature is created by referring to CrudRepository interface and PagingAndSortingRepository provided by Spring Data.

public interface SimpleCrudRepository<T, ID extends Serializable> {
    // (1)
    T findOne(ID id);
    // (2)
    boolean exists(ID id);
    // (3)
    List<T> findAll();
    // (4)
    Page<T> findAll(Pageable pageable);
    // (5)
    long count();
    // (6)
    T save(T entity);
    // (7)
    void delete(T entity);
}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Method to fetch the Entity object of specified ID.
(2)	Method to determine if the Entity of specified ID exists or not.
(3)	Method to retrieve the list of all Entities. In Spring Data, it was java.util.Iterable. Here as a sample, it is set to java.util.List.
(4)	Method to fetch collection of Entity objects corresponding to the specified pagination information (start position, record count, sort information). Pageable and Page are the interfaces provided by Spring Data.
(5)	Method to fetch total number of Entity objects.
(6)	Method to save (create, update) the specified Entity collection.
(7)	Method to delete the specified Entity.

• TodoRepository.java

An example of creating Repository of Todo Entity, which was created in tutorial, on the basis of SimpleCrudRepository interface created above is shown below.

// (1)
public interface TodoRepository extends SimpleCrudRepository<Todo, String> {
    // (2)
    long countByFinished(boolean finished);
}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	TodoRepository interface is created by specifying Todo entity in the generic type parameter “T” and String class in the generic type parameter “ID”.
(2)	Methods not provided by SimpleCrudRepository interface are added in this interface. In this case, “Method for acquiring count of Todo entity objects for which specified tasks have been finished” is added.

3.2.4.5.2. Method definition of Repository interface

It is recommended to have the same signature as CrudRepository and PagingAndSortingRepository provided by Spring Data for the methods performing general CRUD operations.

However, in case of returning collection, (java.util.Collection or java.util.List) interfaces which can be handled in a better way in logic are better than java.lang.Iterable.

In real development environment, it is difficult to develop an application using only general CRUD operations. Hence additional methods are required.

It is recommended to add the methods as per the following rules.

Sr. No.	Types of methods	Rules
	Method for searching a single record	Method name beginning with findOneByto indicate that this method fetches a single record that matches with the condition. In the method name after “findOneBy”, physical or logical name of the field used as search condition must be specified. Hence, the method name must be such that it becomes possible to estimate “the kind of entity that can be fetched using this method”. There must be an argument for each search condition. However, when there are many conditions, DTO containing all search conditions can be provided. Return value must be Entity class.
	Method for searching multiple records	Method name beginning with findAllByto indicate that this method fetches all the records that matches with the condition. In the method name after “findAllBy”, physical or logical name of the field used as search condition must be specified. Hence, the method name must be such that it becomes possible to estimate “the kind of entity that can be fetched using this method”. There must be an argument for each search condition. However, when there are many conditions, DTO containing all search conditions can be provided. Return value must be collection of Entity class.
	Method for searching multiple records with pagination	Method name beginning with findPageByto indicate that this method fetches pages that matches with the condition. In the method name after “findPageBy”, physical or logical name of the field used as search condition must be specified. Hence, the method name must be such that it becomes possible to estimate “the kind of entity that can be fetched using this method”. There must be an argument for each search condition. However, when there are many conditions, DTO containing all search conditions can be provided. Pageable provided by Spring Data should be the interface for pagination information (start position, record count, sort information). Return value should be Page interface provided by Spring Data.
	Count related method	Method name beginning with countBy to indicate that this method fetches count of Entities which matches with the condition. Return value must be long type. In the method name after “countBy”, physical or logical name of the field used as search condition must be specified. Hence, the method name must be such that it becomes possible to estimate “the kind of entity that can be fetched using this method”. There must be an argument for each search condition. However, when there are many conditions, DTO containing all search conditions can be provided.
	Method for existence check	Method name beginning with existsBy to indicate that this method checks the existence of Entity which matches with the condition. In the method name after “existsBy”physical or logical name of the field used as search condition must be specified. Hence, the method name must be such that it becomes possible to estimate “the kind of entity that can be fetched using this method”. There must be an argument for each search condition. However, when there are many conditions, DTO containing all search conditions can be provided. Return value must be boolean type.

Note

In case of methods related to update processing, it is recommended to construct methods in the same way as shown above. “find” in the method name above can be replaced by “update” or “delete”.

• Todo.java (Entity)

public class Todo implements Serializable {
    private String todoId;
    private String todoTitle;
    private boolean finished;
    private Date createdAt;
    // ...
 }

• TodoRepository.java

public interface TodoRepository extends SimpleCrudRepository<Todo, String> {
    // (1)
    Todo findOneByTodoTitle(String todoTitle);
    // (2)
    List<Todo> findAllByUnfinished();
    // (3)
    Page<Todo> findPageByUnfinished();
    // (4)
    long countByExpired(int validDays);
    // (5)
    boolean existsByCreateAt(Date date);
}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Example of method that fetches TODO objects whose title matches with specified value (TODO in which todoTitle=[argument value]). Physical name(todoTitle) of condition field is specified after findOneBy.
(2)	Example of method that fetches unfinished TODO objects (TODO objects where finished=false). Logical condition name is specified after findAllBy.
(3)	Example of method that fetches pages of unfinished TODOs (TODO objects where finished=false). Logical condition name is specified after findPageBy.
(4)	Example of method that fetches count of TODO objects for which the finish deadline has already passed (TODO for which createdAt < sysdate - [finish deadline in days] && finished=false). Logical condition name is specified after countBy.
(5)	Example of method that checks whether a TODO is created on a specific date (createdAt=specified date). Physical name (createdAt) is specified after existsBy.

3.2.4.5.3. Creation of RepositoryImpl

Refer to Implementation of Infrastructure Layer for the implementation of RepositoryImpl.

3.2.5. Implementation of Service

3.2.5.1. Roles of Service

Service plays the following 2 roles.

1. Provides business logic to Controller.

   Business logic consists of create, update, consistency check etc of business data as well as all the processes related to business logic.

   Create and update process of business data should be delegated to Repository(or O/R Mapper) and service should be limited to implementation of business rules.

Note

Regarding distribution of logic between Controller and Service

In this guideline, the logic to be implemented by Controller and Service should be as per the rules given below.

1. For the data requested from the client, single item check and correlated item check is to be performed in Controller (Bean Validation or Spring Validator).
2. Conversion processes (Bean conversion, Type conversion and Format conversion) for the data to be passed to Service, must be performed in Controller instead of Service.
3. Business rules should be implemented in Service.Access to business data is to be delegated to Repository or O/R Mapper.
4. Conversion processes (Type conversion and Format conversion) for the data received from Service (data to respond to the client), must be performed in Controller (View class etc).

2. Declare transaction boundary.

   Declare transaction boundary when business logic is performing any operation which requires ensuring data consistency (mainly data update process).

   Even in case of logic that just read the data, often there are cases where transaction management is required due to the nature of business requirements. In such cases, declare transaction boundary.

   Transaction boundary must be set in Service layer as a principle rule. If it is found to be set in application layer (Web layer), there is a possibility that the extraction of business logic has

   not been performed correctly.

Refer to Regarding transaction management for details.

3.2.5.2. Structure of Service class

Service consists of Service classes and SharedService classes and plays the following role.

In this guideline, POJO (Plain Old Java Object) having @Service annotation is defined as Service or SharedService class.

We are not preventing the creation of interface and base classes that limit the signature of methods.

Sr. No.	Class	Role	Notes related to dependency relationship
	Service class	Provides business logic to the specific Controller. Service class methods must not implement logic that need to be reused.	It is prohibited to call a method of Service class from another Service class method (Figure 1-1).For shared logic, create SharedService class. Method of Service class can be called from multiple Controllers (Figure 1-2). However, it must be created for each controller when processing is to be branched based on the calling controller.In such a scenario, create a method in SharedService class and call that method from the individual Service class methods.
2	SharedService class	Provides shared (reusable) logicfor multiple Controllers and Service classes.	Methods of other SharedService classes can be called from a SharedService (Figure 2-1). However, Calling hierarchy should not become complicated. If calling hierarchy becomes complicated, there is a risk of reduction in maintainability. Methods of SharedService classes can be called from Controller (Figure 2-2). However, it can be only be done if there is no problem from transaction management perspective.If there is a problem from transaction management perspective, first create a method in Service class and implement transaction management in this method. It is prohibited to call methods of Service class from SharedService (Figure 2-3).

Dependency relationship of Service class and SharedService class is shown below.

The numbers inside the diagram are related to the numbering in “Notes related to dependency relationship” column of the above table.

3.2.5.2.1. Reason for separating Service and SharedService

Logic that cannot be (should not be) reused and logic that can be (should be) reused exist in the business logic.

To implement these 2 logics in the same class, it is difficult to decide whether a method can be re-used or not.

To avoid this problem, it is strongly recommended to implement the method to be re-used in the SharedService classin this guideline.

3.2.5.2.2. Reason for prohibiting the calling of other Service classes from Service class

In this guideline, calling methods of other Service classes from a Service class is prohibited.

Service provides business logic to a specific controller and is not created with the assumption of using it from other services.

If it is called directly from other Service classes, the following situations can easily occur and there is a risk of reduced maintainability.

Sr. No.	Situations that can occur
	The logic that must be implemented in the calling service class, gets implemented in the called service class for reasons like “having the logic at a single location” etc. As a result, arguments for identifying the caller, get added to the method easily; Ultimately, the logic is incorrectly abstracted out as shared logic (like utilities). It results into a modular structure without much insight.
	If the stack patterns or stack of services calling each other is large in number, understanding the impact of modifications in source-code due to change in specifications or bug fixes, becomes difficult.

3.2.5.2.3. Regarding interface and base classes to limit signature of method

In order to bring consistency in development of business logic, interfaces and base classes are created which limit the signature of the methods.

The purpose is also to prevent the injection of differences due to development style of each developer by limiting the signature through interfaces and base classes.

Note

In large scale development, there are situations where not every single developer is highly skilled or situations like having consistency in development of business logic considering maintainability after servicing. In such situations, limiting the signature through interfaces can be an appropriate decision.

In this guideline, we do not specifically recommended to create interface to limit signature; however, type of architecture must be selected on the basis of characteristics of the project. decide the type of architecture taking into account the project properties.

Note

Sample of implementation of interface and base classes to limit signature - Interface to limit signature

// (1)
public interface BLogic<I, O> {
  O execute(I input);
}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Interface to limit signature of implementation method of business logic. In the above example, it is defined as generic type of input (I) and output (O) information having one method (execute) for executing business logic. In this guideline, the above interface is called BLogic interface.

To standardize process flow of business logic when a fixed common process is included in Service, base classes are created to limit signature of method.

• Base classes to limit signature

// (2)
@Service
@Transactional
public abstract class AbstractBLogic<I, O> implements BLogic<I, O> {

    public O execute(I input){
      try{

          // omitted

          // (3)
          preExecute(input);

          // (4)
          O output = doExecute(input);

          // omitted

          return output;
      } finally {
          // omitted
      }

    }

    protected abstract void preExecute(I input);

    protected abstract O doExecute(I input);

}

Sr. No.	Description
(2)	While creating a base class, since the method executed externally and the class which implements the method are targets of AOP in the specification of @Transactional, they are assigned to base class when the transaction control is necessary. Similar to @Servicve, it must be assigned to the base class when Service is considered as an target using AOP, as for ResultMessagesLoggingInterceptor.
(3)	Call the method to perform pre-processing before executing business logic from base classes. In the preExecute method, business rules are checked.
(4)	Call the method executing business logic from the base classes.

Sample of extending base classes to limit signature is shown below.

• BLogic class (Service)

// (5)
public interface XxxBLogic extends BLogic<XxxInput, XxxOutput> {

}

Sr. No.	Description
(5)	Create an interface that inherits BLogic interface in order to enable type-safe injection. Implement a sub-interface which inherits BLogic in order to enable calling via a method of new interface.

@Service
public class XxxBLogicImpl extends AbstractBLogic<XxxInput, XxxOutput> implements XxxBLogic {

    // (6)
    @Override
    protected void preExecute(XxxInput input) {

        // omitted
        Tour tour = tourRepository.findOne(input.getTourId());
        Date reservationLimitDate = tour.reservationLimitDate();
        if(input.getReservationDate().after(reservationLimitDate)){
            throw new BusinessException(ResultMessages.error().add("e.xx.xx.0001"));
        }

    }

    // (7)
    @Override
    protected XxxOutput doExecute(XxxInput input) {
        TourReservation tourReservation = new TourReservation();

        // omitted

        tourReservationRepository.save(tourReservation);
        XxxOutput output = new XxxOutput();
        output.setTourReservation(tourReservation);

        // omitted
        return output;
    }

}

Sr. No.	Description
(6)	Implement pre-process before executing business logic. Business rules are checked.
(7)	Implement business logic. Logic is implemented to satisfy business rules.

• Controller

// (8)
@Inject
XxxBLogic xxxBLogic;

public String reserve(XxxForm form, RedirectAttributes redirectAttributes) {

    XxxInput input = new XxxInput();
    // omitted

    // (9)
    XxxOutput output = xxxBlogic.execute(input);

    // omitted

    redirectAttributes.addFlashAttribute(output.getTourReservation());
    return "redirect:/xxx?complete";
}

Sr. No.	Description
(8)	Controller injects BLogic interface to be called.
(9)	Controller calls execute method of BLogic interface and executes business logic.

3.2.5.3. Patterns of creating service class

There are mainly 3 patterns for creating Service.

Sr. No.	Unit	Creation method	Description
	For each Entity	Create Service paired with the main Entity.	Main Entity is in other words, business data. If the application is to be designed and implemented with focus on business data, then Service classes should be created in this way. If service is created in this way, business logic will also be created for each entity and it will become to extract shared logic. However, if Service is created using this pattern, its affinity is not so good with the type of application which has to be developed by introducing a large number of developers at the same time. It can be said that the pattern is suitable when for the developing small or medium sized application.
	For each use-case	Create Service paired with the use-case.	If the application is to be designed and implemented with focus on events on the screen, Service should be created in this way. If the Service is created using this pattern, it is possible to assign a person to each use case; hence, its affinity is good with the type of application which has to be developed by introducing a large number of developer at the same time. On the other hand, if Service is created using this pattern, shared logic within use case can be extracted to a single location; however, shared logic which spans across multiple use-case might not get extracted to a single location. When it is very important to have extract shared logic out to a single location, it becomes necessary devise measures like having a separate team to look after designing shared components of business logic that span across multiple use cases.
	For each event	Create Service paired with the events generated from screen.	If the application is to be designed and implemented with focus on events on the screen and BLogic class is auto-generated using TERASOLUNA ViSC, Service should be created in this way. In this guideline, the Service class created using this pattern is called BLogic. The characteristics of the application if creating Service using this pattern are basically same as those when creating Service for each use case. However, in this case extracting shared logic out of business logic might get more difficult compared to creation of Service for each use-case (Pattern No. 2). In this guideline, pattern of creating Service for each event is not specifically recommended. However, in large scale development, creating Service using this pattern can be considered as one of the options with the view of having consistency in development style of business logic from maintainability point of view.

Warning

The pattern of Service creation must be decided by taking into account the features of application to be developed and the structure of development team.

It is not necessary to narrow down to any one pattern out of the 3 indicated patterns. Creating Services using different patterns randomly should be avoided for sure; however, patterns can be used in combinations, if policy of usage of patterns in certain specific conditions has been well-thought decision and has been directed by the architect. For example, the following combinations are possible.

[Example of usage of patterns in combination]

• For the business logic very important to the whole application, create as SharedService class for each Entity.
• For the business logic to be processed for the events from the screen, create as Service class for each Controller.
• In the Service class for each controller, implement business logic by calling the sharedService as and when required.

Tip

BLogic is generated directly from design documents when using “TERASOLUNA ViSC”.

3.2.5.3.1. Image of Application development - Creating Service for each Entity

Following is the image of application development when creating a Service for each Entity.

Note

An example of a typical application in which a Service is created for each Entity is a REST application. REST application provides CRUD operations (POST, GET, PUT, DELETE of HTTP) for published resources on HTTP. Most of the times, the resources published on HTTP are business data (Entity) or part of business data (Entity), they have good compatibility with the pattern of creating Service for each Entity.

In case of REST application, most of the times, use-cases are also extracted on a “per Entity” basis. Hence, the structure is similar to the case when Service is created for on a “per use-case” basis.

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Implement Service by assigning a person for each Entity. If there is no specific reason, it is desirable that Controller must also be created for each Entity and must be developed by the same developer who created the Service class.
(2)	Implement SharedService if there is shared logic between multiple business logics. In the above figure, different person is assigned as the in-charge. However, he may be the same person as (1) depending per the project structure.

3.2.5.3.2. Image of Application development - Creating Service for each use case

Following is the image of application development when creating a Service for each use-case.

In case of use-case which performs CRUD operations on the Entity, structure is same as in case of creating Service for each Entity.

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Implement Service by assigning a person for each use-case. If there is no specific reason, it is desirable that Controller must also be created for each use-case and must be developed by the same developer who created the Service class.
(2)	Implement SharedService if there is shared logic between multiple business logics. In the above figure, different person is assigned as the in-charge. However, he may be the same person as (1) depending per the project structure.

Note

With an increase in the size of the use-cases, the development scope of a person increases. At such a point of time, it becomes difficult to divide the work of this use-case with other developers. In case of application which has to be developed by introducing a large number of developer at the same time, the use-case can be further split into finer use-cases and which can then be allocated to more number of developers.

Below is the image of application development when the use-case is further split.

Splitting a use-case has no impact on SharedService. Hence, the explanation is omitted here.

Sr. No.

Description

(1)

Divide the use-case into finer processes which make-up the complete use-case. Assign each fine process to a developer. Each developer creates the Service for assigned process. Note that the processes here are operations like search, create, update, delete etc. and these processes do not have a direct mapping to the processing required to be done for each event generated on screen. For example, if it the event generated on screen is “Update”, it includes multiple finer processes such as “Fetching the data to be updated”, “Compatibility check of update contents” etc. If there is no specific reason, it is desirable that Controller must also be created for each of these finer processes and must be developed by the same developer who creates the Service class.

Tip

In some projects, “group of use-cases” and “use-cases” are used in place of “use-case” and “processes” used in this guideline.

3.2.5.3.3. Image of Application development - Creating Service for each use event

Following is the image of application development when creating a Service(BLogic) for each event.

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Implement Service(BLogic) by assigning a person for each event. Above example is an extreme case where separate developer is assigned for each service(BLogic). In reality, a single person must be assigned for a use-case.
(2)	If there is no specific reason, controller also should be created on “per use-case” basis.
(3)	Even if the separate Service(BLogic) is created for each event, it is recommended that same person is the in-charge of the complete use-case.
(4)	Implement in SharedService to share the logic with multiple business logics. In the above figure, different person is assigned as the in-charge. However, he may be the same person as (1) depending per the project structure.

Note

With an increase in the size of the use-cases, the development scope of a person increases. At such a point of time, it becomes difficult to divide the work of this use-case with other developers. In case of application which has to be developed by introducing a large number of developer at the same time, the use-case can be further split into finer use-cases and which can then be allocated to more number of developers.

Below is the image of application development when the use-case is further split.

Splitting a use-case has no impact on SharedService. Hence, the explanation is omitted here.

Sr. No.

Description

(1)

Divide the use-case into finer processes which make-up the complete use-case. Assign each fine process to a developer. Each developer creates the Service for assigned process. Note that the processes here are operations like search, create, update, delete etc. and these processes do not have a direct mapping to the processing required to be done for each event generated on screen. For example, if it the event generated on screen is “Update”, it includes multiple finer processes such as “Fetching the data to be updated”, “Compatibility check of update contents” etc. If there is no specific reason, it is desirable that Controller must also be created for each of these finer processes and must be developed by the same developer who creates the Service class.

3.2.5.4. Creation of Service class

3.2.5.4.1. Methods of creating Service class

Below are the points to be taken care of while creating Service class.

• Creation of Service interface

public interface CartService { // (1)
    // omitted
}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	It is recommended to create Service interface. By providing an interface, it is possible to execute the method published as Service explicitly.

Note

Merits from architecture perspective

1. If interface is there, When using AOP, Dynamic proxies functionality of standard JDK is used. In case of no interface, CGLIB included in Spring Framework is used. In case of CGLIB there are certain restrictions like “Advice cannot be applied on final methods” etc. Refer to Spring Reference Document -Aspect Oriented Programming with Spring(Proxying mechanisms)-for details.
2. It becomes easier to create a stub of business logic. When application layer and domain layer are developed in parallel using different development teams, stubs of Service are required. When there is a need to create stubs, it is recommended to have interface .

• Creation of Service class

@Service // (1)
@Transactional // (2)
public class CartServiceImpl implements CartService { // (3) (4)
    // omitted
}

<context:component-scan base-package="xxx.yyy.zzz.domain" /> <!-- (1) -->

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Add @Service annotation to class. By adding the above annotation, bean definition in configuration file is not required. Specify package for component scanning in base-package attribute of <context:component-scan> element. In case of this example, all the classes in “xxx.yyy.zzz.domain” is registered in container.
(2)	Add @Transactional annotation to class. By adding the above annotation, transaction boundary is set for to the all the methods of the Service class. value attribute should be specified as required. Refer to Information required for “Declarative transaction management” for details. Moreover, to understand the points to be noted when using @Transactional annotation, it is advisable to confirm with “Settings for using transaction management”.
(3)	Consider interface name as XxxService and class name as XxxServiceImpl. Any naming conventions can be used. However, it is recommended to use distinguishable naming conventions for Service class and SharedService class.
(4)	Service class must not maintain state. Register it in container as bean of singleton scope . Objects (POJO such as Entity/DTO/VO) and values (primitive type, primitive wrapper class) where state changes in each thread should not be maintained in class level fields. Setting scope to any value other than singleton (prototype, request, session) using @Scope annotation is also prohibited.

Note

Reason for adding @Transactional annotation to class

Transaction boundary is required only for the business logic that updates the database. However, it is recommended to apply the annotation at class level to prevent bugs due to skipped annotation. However, defining @Transactional annotation only at required places (methods which update the database) is also fine.

Note

Reason to prohibit non-singleton scopes

1. prototype, request, session are the scopes for registering bean that maintains state. Hence they must not be used in Service class.
2. When scope is set to request or prototype, performance is affected as the bean generation frequency is high in DI container.
3. When scope is set to request or session, it cannot be used in non Web applications (for example, Batch application).

3.2.5.4.2. Creation of methods of Service class

Below are the points to be taken care of while writing methods of Service class.

• Creation of method of Service interface

public interface CartService {
    Cart createCart(); // (1) (2)
    Cart findCart(String cartId); // (1) (2)
}

• Creation of methods of Service class

@Service
@Transactional
public class CartServiceImpl implements CartService {

    @Inject
    CartRepository cartRepository;

    public Cart createCart() { // (1) (2)
        Cart cart = new Cart();
        // ...
        cartRepository.save(cart);
        return cart;
    }

    @Transactional(readOnly = true) // (3)
    public Cart findCart(String cartId) { // (1) (2)
        Cart cart = cartRepository.findByCartId(cartId);
        // ...
        return cart;
    }

}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Create a method of Service class for each business logic.
(2)	Define methods in Service interface and implement business logic in its implementation class.
(3)	Add @Transactional annotation for changes to default transaction definition (class level annotation). Attributes should be specified as per the requirement. Refer to Information required for “Declarative transaction management” for details. Moreover, to understand the points to be noted when using @Transactional annotation, it is advisable to confirm with “Settings for using transaction management”.

Tip

Transaction definition of business logic for reference

When business logic for reference is to be implemented, by specifying @Transactional(readOnly = true), instruction can be given to run the SQL under “Read-only transactions” for JDBC driver.

The way of handling read-only transactions depends on the implementation of JDBC driver; hence, confirm the specifications of JDBC driver to be used.

Note

Points to be noted when using “Read-only transactions”

If it is set to “perform health check” when retrieving a connection from connection pool, “Read-only transactions” may not be enabled. For details on this event and to avoid the same, refer to About cases where “Read-only transactions” are not enabled.

Note

Transaction definition when a new transaction is required to be started

Set @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW) to start a new transaction without participating in the transaction of the caller method.

3.2.5.4.3. Regarding arguments and return values of methods of Service class

The below points must be considered for arguments and return values of methods of Service class.

Serializable classes (class implementing java.io.Serializable) must be used for arguments and return values of Service class.

Since there is possibility of Service class getting deployed as distributed application, it is recommended to allow only Serializable class.

Typical arguments and return values of the methods are as follows.

• Primitive types (int, long)
• Primitive wrapper classes (java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Long)
• java standard classes (java.lang.String, java.util.Date)
• Domain objects (Entity, DTO)
• Input/output objects (DTO)
• Collection (implementation class of java.util.Collection) of above types
• void
• etc …

Note

Input/Output objects

1. Input object indicates the object that has all the input values required for executing Service method.
2. Output object indicates the object that has all the execution results (output values) of Service method.

If business logic(BLogic class) is generated using “TERASOLUNA ViSC” then, input and output objects are used as argument and return value of the of BLogic class.

Values that are forbidden as arguments and return values are as follows.

• Objects (javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest , javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse , javax.servlet.http.HttpSession , org.springframework.http.server.ServletServerHttpRequest) which are dependent on implementation architecture of application layer (Servlet API or web layer API of Spring).
• Model(Form, DTO) classes of application layer
• Implementation classes of java.util.Map

Note

Reason for prohibition

1. If objects depending on implementation architecture of application layer are allowed, then application layer and domain layer get tightly coupled.
2. java.util.Map is too generalized. Using it for method arguments and return values makes it difficult to understand what type of object is stored inside it. Further, since the values are managed using keys, the following problems may occur.

• Values are mapped to a unique key and hence cannot be retrieved by specifying a key name which is different from the one specified at the time of inserting the value.
• When key name has to be changed, it becomes difficult to determine the impacted area.

How to sharing the same DTO between the application layer and domain layer is shown below.

• DTO belonging to the package of domain layer can be used in application layer.

Warning

Form and DTO of application layer should not be used in domain layer.

3.2.5.5. Implementation of SharedService class

3.2.5.5.1. Creation of SharedService class

Below are the points to be taken care of while creating SharedService class.

Only the points which are different from Service class are explained here.

1. Add @Transactional annotation to class as and when required.

   @Transactional annotation is not required when data access is not involved.
2. Interface name should be XxxSharedService and class name should be XxxSharedServiceImpl.

   Any other naming conventions can also be used. However, it is recommended to use distinguishable naming conventions for Service class and SharedService class.

3.2.5.5.2. Creation of SharedService class method

Below are the points to be taken care of while writing methods of SharedService class.

Only the points which are different from Service class are explained here.

1. Methods in SharedService class must be created for each logic which is shared between multiple business logics.

2. Add @Transactional annotation to class as and when required.

   Annotation is not required when data access is not involved.

3.2.5.5.3. Regarding arguments and return values of SharedService class method

Points are same as Regarding arguments and return values of methods of Service class.

3.2.5.6. Implementation of logic

Implementation in Service and SharedService is explained here.

Service and SharedService has implementation of logic related to operations such as data fetch, update, consistency check of business data and implementation related to business rules.

Example of a typical logic is explained below.

3.2.5.6.1. Operate on business data

Refer to the following for the examples of data (Entity) fetch and update.

• When using MyBatis3, Database Access (MyBatis3)
• When using JPA, Database Access (JPA)

3.2.5.6.2. Returning messages

Warning message and business error message are the two type of messages which must be resolved in Service (refer to the figure in red broken line below).

Other messages should be resolved in application layer.

Refer to Message Management for message types and message pattern.

Note

Regarding resolving message

In service, instead of the actual message the information required for building the message (message code, message insert value) is resolved.

Refer to the following for detailed implementation method.

• Returning warning message
• Notifying business error

3.2.5.6.3. Returning warning message

Message object must be returned for warning message. If domain object such as Entity needs to be returned with it,

message object and domain object should inserted into output object (DTO) and this output object must be returned.

Message object ( org.terasoluna.gfw.common.message.ResultMessages ) is provided as common library. When the class provided in common library

does not fulfill the requirements, message object should be created for each project.

• Creation of DTO

public class OrderResult implements Serializable {
    private ResultMessages warnMessages;
    private Order order;

    // omitted

}

• Implementation of method of Service class

  Following is an example of implementation of displaying a warning message. The message is “Products may not be delivered together since the order includes products which are not available right now”.

public OrderResult submitOrder(Order order) {

    // omitted

    boolean hasOrderProduct = orderRepository.existsByOrderProduct(order); // (1)

    // omitted

    Order order = orderRepository.save(order);

    // omitted

    ResultMessages warnMessages = null;
    // (2)
    if(hasOrderProduct) {
        warnMessages = ResultMessages.warn().add("w.xx.xx.0001");
    }
    // (3)
    OrderResult orderResult = new OrderResult();
    orderResult.setOrder(order);
    orderResult.setWarnMessages(warnMessages);
    return orderResult;
}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	When the order includes products which are not available right now, set hasOrderProduct to true.
(2)	In the above example, when the order includes products which are not available right now, a warning message occurs.
(3)	In the above example, the registered Order object and warning message are returned by storing objects in a DTO called OrderResult.

3.2.5.6.4. Notifying business error

Business exception is thrown when business rules are violated while executing business logic.

The following can be the cases.

• When reservation date exceeds deadline while making tour reservation
• When the product is out of stock at the time of placing an order
• etc …

Business exception ( org.terasoluna.gfw.common.exception.BusinessException ) is provided as common library.

When business exception class provided in common library does not fulfill the requirements, business exception class should be created in the project.

It is recommended to create business exception class as subclass of java.lang.RuntimeException.

Note

Reason for considering business exception as an unchecked exception

Since business exceptions need to be handled in controller class, they can be configured as checked exception. However in this guideline, it is recommended that business exception be subclass of unchecked exception (java.lang.RuntimeException). By default, if there is a RuntimeException, transaction will be rolled back. Hence, doing this will prevent leaving a bug in the source-code due to inadequate settings of @Transactional annotation. Obviously, if settings are changed such that transaction rollbacks even in case checked exceptions, business exception can be configured as subclass of checked exceptions.

Example of throwing business exception.

Below example notifies that reservation is past the deadline and a business error.

// omitted

if(currentDate.after(reservationLimitDate)) { // (1)
    throw new BusinessException(ResultMessages.error().add("e.xx.xx.0001"));
}

// omitted

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Business exception is thrown since reservation date is past the deadline at the time of making reservation.

Refer to Exception Handling for details of entire exception handling.

3.2.5.6.5. Notifying system error

System exception is thrown when error occurs in system while executing business logic.

The following can be the cases.

• When master data, directories and files that should already exist, do not exist
• When a checked exception generated by a library method is caught and this exception indicates abnormal system state.
• etc …

System exception (org.terasoluna.gfw.common.exception.SystemException) is provided as common library.

When system exception class provided in common library does not fulfill the requirements, system exception class should be created in the project.

It is recommended to create system exception class as subclass of java.lang.RuntimeException.

The reason is system exception should not be handled by application code and rollback target of @Transactinal annotation is set to java.lang.RuntimeException by default.

Example of throwing system exception.

Example notifying the non-existence of the specific product in product master as system error is shown below.

ItemMaster itemMaster = itemMasterRepository.findOne(itemCode);
if(itemMaster == null) { // (1)
    throw new SystemException("e.xx.fw.0001",
        "Item master data is not found. item code is " + itemCode + ".");
}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	System exception is thrown since master data that should already exist does not exist. Example of case when system error is detected in logic）

Example that throws system exception while catching IO exception while copying the file is shown below.

// ...

try {
    FileUtils.copy(srcFile, destFile);
} catch(IOException e) { // (1)
    throw new SystemException("e.xx.fw.0002",
        "Failed file copy. src file '" + srcFile + "' dest file '" + destFile + "'.", e);
}

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	System exception that is classified into invalid system state is thrown by the library method. The exception generated by library must be passed to system exception class as cause exception. If cause exception is lost, error occurrence location and basic error cause cannot be traced from the stack trace.

Note

Regarding handling of data access error

When data access error occurs in Repository and O/R Mapper while executing business logic, it is converted to subclass of org.springframework.dao.DataAccessException and thrown. Error can be handled in application layer instead of catching in business logic. However, some errors like unique constraints violation error should be handled in business logic as per business requirements. Refer to Database Access (Common) for details.

3.2.6. Regarding transaction management

Transaction management is required in the logic where data consistency must be ensured.

3.2.6.1. Method of transaction management

There are various transaction management methods. However, in this guideline, it is recommended to use “Declarative Transaction Management” provided by Spring Framework.

3.2.6.1.1. Declarative transaction management

In “Declarative transaction management”, the information required for transaction management can be declared by the following 2 methods.

• Declaration in XML(bean definition file).
• Declaration using annotation (@Transactional) (Recommended).

Refer to Spring Reference Document -Transaction Management(Declarative transaction management)- for the details on “Declarative type transaction management” provided by Spring Framework.

Note

Reason for recommending annotation method

1. The transaction management to be performed can be understood by just looking at the source code.
2. AOP settings for transaction management is not required if annotations are used and so XML becomes simple.

3.2.6.1.2. Information required for “Declarative transaction management”

Specify @Transactional annotation for at class level or method level which are considered as target of transaction management and specify the information required for

transaction control in attributes of @Transactional annotation.

Note

In this guideline, it is a prerequisite to use @org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional annotation provided by Spring Framework.

Tip

From Spring 4, it is possible to use @javax.transaction.Transactional annotation added from JTA 1.2.

However, in this guideline, it is recommended to use an annotation of Spring Framework that can specify the information required for “Declarative transaction management” in a much more detailed way.

Following attributes can be specified if Spring Framework annotation is used.

• NESTED(JDBC savepoint) as an attribute value of the propagation method of transaction (propagation attribute).
• Isolation level of transaction (isolation attribute)
• Timeout period of transaction (timeout attribute)
• Read-only flag of transaction (readOnly attribute)

Sr. No.	Attribute name	Description
1	propagation	Specify transaction propagation method. [REQUIRED] Starts transaction if not started. (default when omitted) [REQUIRES_NEW] Always starts a new transaction. [SUPPORTS] Uses transaction if started. Does not use if not started. [NOT_SUPPORTED] Does not use transaction. [MANDATORY] Transaction should start. An exception occurs if not started. [NEVER] Does not use transaction (never start). An exception occurs if started. [NESTED] save points are set. They are valid only in JDBC.
2	isolation	Specify isolation level of transaction. Since this setting depends on DB specifications, settings should be decided by checking DB specifications. [DEFAULT] Isolation level provided by DB by default.(default when omitted) [READ_UNCOMMITTED] Reads (uncommitted) data modified in other transactions. [READ_COMMITTED] Does not read (uncommitted) data modified in other transactions. [REPEATABLE_READ] Data read by other transactions cannot be updated. [SERIALIZABLE] Isolates transactions completely. Isolation level of transaction is considered as the parameter related to exclusion control. Refer to Exclusive Control for exclusion control.
3	timeout	Specify timeout of transaction (seconds). -1 by default (Depends on specifications and settings of DB to be used)
4	readOnly	Specify Read-only flag of transaction. false by default (Not read-only)
5	rollbackFor	Specify list of exception classes to rollback transactions. Blank by default (Not specified)
6	rollbackForClassName	Specify list of exception class names to rollback transactions. Blank by default (Not specified)
7	noRollbackFor	Specify list of exception classes to commit transactions. Blank by default (Not specified)
8	noRollbackForClassName	Specify list of exception classes to commit transactions. Blank by default (Not specified)

Note

Location to specify the @Transactional annotation

It is recommended to specify the annotation at the class level or method level of the class. Must be noted that it should not interface or method of interface. For the reason, refer to 2nd Tips of Spring Reference Document -Transaction Management(Using @Transactional)-.

Warning

Default operations of rollback and commit when exception occurs

When rollbackFor and noRollbackFor is not specified, Spring Framework performs the following operations.

• Rollback when unchecked exception of (java.lang.RuntimeException and java.lang.Error) class or its subclass occurs.
• Commit when checked exception of (java.lang.Exception) class or its subclass occurs. (Necessary to note)

Note

Regarding value attributes of @Transactional annotation

There is a value attribute in @Transactional annotation. However, this attribute specifies which Transaction Manager to be used when multiple Transaction Managers are declared. It is not required to specify when there is only one Transaction Manager. When multiple Transaction Managers need to be used, refer to Spring Reference Document -Transaction Management(Multiple Transaction Managers with @Transactional)-.

Note

Default isolation levels of main DB are given below.

Default isolation levels of main DB are given below.

• Oracle : READ_COMMITTED
• DB2 : READ_COMMITTED
• PostgreSQL : READ_COMMITTED
• SQL Server : READ_COMMITTED
• MySQL : REPEATABLE_READ

Note

Cases where “Read-only transactions” are not enabled

A mechanism is provided to run SQL under “Read-only transactions” by specifying readOnly = true; however, when all of the following conditions are satisfied, there will be a JDBC driver where “Read-only transactions” are not enabled.

[Conditions to generate this event]

• Perform health check when retrieving a connection from connection pool.
• Disable ‘Auto commit’ of connection retrieved from connection pool.
• Use DataSourceTransactionManager or JpaTransactionManager as PlatformTransactionManager. (This event does not occur when using JtaTransactionManager).

[JDBC driver where occurrence of this event is confirmed]

• org.postgresql:postgresql:9.3-1102-jdbc41 (JDBC 4.1 compatible JDBC driver for PostgreSQL 9.3)

[Method to avoid this event]

In a case where “Read-only transactions” are not enabled, if readOnly = true is specified, it ends up carrying out the unnecessary processes. Therefore, it is recommended to execute the SQL under “Updatable transactions” even for the reference processes.

Other methods to avoid this event are as follows:

• Do not perform health check when retrieving a connection from connection pool.
• Enable ‘Auto commit’ of the connection retrieved from connection pool. (Disable ‘Auto commit’ only when transaction management is required)

However, However, do not change the design for ‘health check’ and ‘auto commit’ to avoid this event.

[Remarks]

• Reproduction of this event is confirmed on PostgreSQL 9.3 and Oracle 12c. It is not performed on any other database and versions.
• In PostgreSQL 9.3, SQLException occurs when java.sql.Connection#setReadOnly(boolean) method is called.
• When SQL or API call of JDBC is logged in using log4jdbc, SQLException occurred from JDBC driver is output to log with ERROR level.
• SQL Exception occurred from JDBC driver is ignored by exception handling of Spring Framework. Hence, even though it is not an error as application behavior, the “Read-only transactions” is not enabled.
• Occurrence of this event is not confirmed in Oracle 12c.

[Reference]

When following log is output using log4jdbc, it will be treated as a case corresponding to this event.

date:2015-02-20 16:11:56        thread:main     user:   X-Track:        level:ERROR     logger:jdbc.audit                                       message:3. Connection.setReadOnly(true)
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Cannot change transaction read-only property in the middle of a transaction.
    at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Connection.setReadOnly(AbstractJdbc2Connection.java:741) ~[postgresql-9.3-1102-jdbc41.jar:na]
    ...

Note

timeout attribute of @Transactional annotation

Although @Transactionalannotation consists of timeoutattribute, value specified in timeoutattribute is ignored in MyBatis3.3 and MyBatis-Spring 1.2 combination and is not used.

3.2.6.1.3. Propagation of transaction

In most of the cases, Propagation method of transaction is “REQUIRED”.

However, since “REQUIRES_NEW” is also used according to the requirements of Application, transaction control flow in case of “REQUIRED” and “REQUIRES_NEW” is explained below.

The explanation of other propagation methods is omitted in this guideline since their usage frequency is very low.

Transaction control flow when propagation method of transaction is set to “REQUIRED”

When propagation method of transaction is set to “REQUIRED”, all sequential processes called from controller are processed in the same transaction.

1. Controller calls a method of Service class. At this time, since started transaction does not exist, transaction is started using TransactionInterceptor.
2. TransactionInterceptor calls the method of service class after starting the transaction.
3. Service class calls a method of SharedService. This method is also under transaction control. At this time, though started transaction exists, TransactionInterceptor participates in the started transaction without starting a new transaction.
4. TransactionInterceptor calls the method under transaction control after participating in the started transaction.
5. TransactionInterceptor performs commit or rollback according to result of processing and ends the transaction.

Note

Reason for occurrence of org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException

When propagation method of transaction is set to “REQUIRED”, though there is only one physical transaction, internally Spring Framework creates transaction boundaries. In case of above example, when a method of SharedService is called, a TransactionInterceptor is started which internally provides transaction control boundary at SharedService level. Therefore, when an exception (which is set as target of rollback) occurs in SharedService method, status of transaction is set to rollback (rollback-only) by TransactionInterceptor. This transaction now cannot be committed. Going further, if the Service method tries to commit this transaction due to conflicting settings of rollback target exception between Service method and SharedShared method, UnexpectedRollbackException is generated by Spring Framework notifying that there is inconsistency in transaction control settings. When UnexpectedRollbackException is generated, it should be checked that there is no inconsistency in rollbackFor and noRollbackFor settings.

Transaction management flow when propagation method of transaction is set to “REQUIRES_NEW”

When propagation method of transaction is set to “REQUIRES_NEW”, a part of the sequence of processing (Processing done in SharedService) are processed in another transaction when called from Controller.

1. Controller calls a method of Service class. This method is under transaction control. At this time, since started transaction does not exist, transaction is started by TransactionInterceptor (Hereafter, the started transaction is referred as “Transaction A”).
2. TransactionInterceptor calls the method of service class after transaction (Transaction A) is started.
3. Service class calls a method of SharedService class. At this time, though started transaction (Transaction A) exists, since propagation method of transaction is “REQUIRES_NEW”, new transaction is started by TransactionInterceptor. (Hereafter, started transaction is referred as “Transaction B”). At this time, “Transaction A” is interrupted and the status changes to ‘Awaiting to resume’.
4. TransactionInterceptor calls the method of SharedService class after Transaction B is started.
5. TransactionInterceptor performs commit or rollback according to the process result and ends the Transaction B. At this time, “Transaction A” is resumed and status is changed to Active.
6. TransactionInterceptor performs commit or rollback according to the process result and ends the Transaction A.

3.2.6.1.4. Way of calling the method which is under transaction control

Since “Declarative transaction management” provided by Spring Framework is implemented using AOP, transaction management is applied only for method calls for which AOP is enabled.

Since the default mode of AOP is “proxy” mode, transaction control will be applied only when public method is called from another class.

Note that transaction control is not applied if the target method is called from an internal method even if the target method is a public method.

• Way of calling the method which is under transaction control

• Way of calling the method which is not under transaction control

Note

In order to bring internal method calls under transaction control

It is possible to enable transaction control for internal method calls as well by setting the AOP mode to "aspectj". However, if internal method call of transaction management is enabled, the route of transaction management may become complicated; hence it is recommended to use the default “proxy” for AOP mode.

3.2.6.2. Settings for using transaction management

The settings required for using transaction management are explained.

3.2.6.2.1. PlatformTransactionManager settings

In order to have transaction management done, it is necessary to define the bean of PlatformTransactionManager.

Spring Framework has provided couple of classes based on the purpose; any class can be specified that meets the requirement of the application.

• xxx-env.xml

Example of settings for managing the transaction using JDBC connection which is fetched from DataSource is given below.

<!-- (1) -->
<bean id="transactionManager"
      class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager">
    <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" />
    <property name="rollbackOnCommitFailure" value="true" />
</bean>

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	Specify the implementation class of PlatformTransactionManager. It is recommended to set id as “transactionManager”.

Note

When transaction management (Global transaction management) is required for multiple DBs (Multiple resources)

• It is necessary to use org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager and manage transactions by using JTA functionality provided by application server.
• When JTA is to be used in WebSphere and Oracle WebLogic Server, a JtaTransactionManager which is extended for the application server is automatically set by specifying <tx:jta-transaction-manager/>.

Implementation class of PlatformTransactionManager provided by Spring Framework

Sr. No.	Class name	Description
	org.springframework.jdbc.datasource. DataSourceTransactionManager	Implementation class for managing the transaction by calling API of JDBC(java.sql.Connection). Use this class when MyBatis and JdbcTemplate is to be used.
	org.springframework.orm.jpa. JpaTransactionManager	Implementation class for managing the transaction by calling API of JPA(javax.persistence.EntityTransaction). Use this class when JPA is to be used.
	org.springframework.transaction.jta. JtaTransactionManager	Implementation class for managing the transaction by calling API of JTA(javax.transaction.UserTransaction). Use this class to manage transaction with resources (Database/Messaging service/General-purpose EIS(Enterprise Information System) etc.) using JTS (Java Transaction Service) provided by application server. When it is necessary to execute the operations with multiple resources in a single transaction, it is necessary to use JTA for managing transactions.

3.2.6.2.2. Settings for enabling @Transactional

In this guideline, it is recommended to manage transaction by using “Declarative transaction management” where @Transactional annotation is used.

Here, the settings required for using @Transactional annotation are explained.

• xxx-domain.xml

<tx:annotation-driven /> <!-- (1) -->

Sr. No.	Description
(1)	With use of <tx:annotation-driven> element in XML (bean definition file), transaction control gets enabled at the locations where @Transactional annotation is used.

Note

Regarding drawbacks of transaction management

There is a description regarding “Understanding drawbacks of transaction” in IBM DeveloperWorks. Read this article about pitfalls of transaction management and pitfalls while using @Transactional of Spring Framework. Refer to Article on IBM DeveloperWorksfor details.

Since the article of IBM DeveloperWorks is an old article (year 2009), some of the content is different than the behavior when using Spring Framework 4.1.

Specifically, the contents of “Listing 7. Using read-only with REQUIRED propagation mode - JPA”.

From Spring Framework 4.1, when Hibernate ORM 4.2 or higher version is used as JPA provider, it has been improved so that instruction can be given to run the SQL under “Read-only transactions” for JDBC driver (SPR-8959).

The way of handling read-only transactions depends on the implementation of JDBC driver; hence, confirm the specifications of JDBC driver to be used.

Note

Programmatic transaction management

In this guideline, “Declarative transaction management” is recommended. However, programmatic transaction management is also possible. Refer to Spring Reference Document -Transaction Management(Programmatic transaction management)- for details.

3.2.6.2.3. Regarding attributes of <tx:annotation-driven> element

Various attributes can be specified in <tx:annotation-driven> and default behavior can be customized.

• xxx-domain.xml

<tx:annotation-driven
     transaction-manager="txManager"
     mode="aspectj"
     proxy-target-class="true"
     order="0" />

Sr. No.	Attribute	Description
1	transaction-manager	Specify PlatformTransactionManager bean. When omitted, bean registered with the name “transactionManager” is used.
2	mode	Specify AOP mode. When omitted, "proxy" is the default value. "aspectj" can be also be specified. It is recommended to use "proxy".
3	proxy-target-class	Flag to specify whether proxy target is limited to class (this is valid only in case of mode=”proxy”). When omitted, it will be “false”. In case of false, if the target class has an interface, proxy is done using dynamic proxies functionality of standard JDK. When there is no interface, proxy is done using GCLIB functionality. In case of true, proxy is done using GCLIB function irrespective of whether interface is available or not.
4	order	Order of Advice of AOP (Priority). When omitted, it will be “Last (Lowest priority)”.

3.2.7. Tips

3.2.7.1. Method of dealing with violation of business rules as field error

When it is necessary to output the error of business rules for each field, the mechanism of (Bean Validation or Spring Validator) on the Controller side should be used.

In this case, It is recommended to implement check logic as Service class and then to call the method of Service class from Bean Validation or Spring Validator.

Refer to Input Validation business logic approach for details.